搜索结果: 1-4 共查到“天文学 Comment”相关记录4条 . 查询时间(0.031 秒)
Reply to 'A Comment on '"The Far Future of Exoplanet Direct Characterization" - the Case for Interstellar Space Probes'
Earth and Planetary Astrophysics (astro-ph.EP) Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics (astro-ph.IM)
2010/12/28
Reply to A Comment on The Far Future of Exoplanet Direct Characterization - the Case for Interstellar Space Probess by Ian Crawford. The paper The Far Future of Exoplanet Direct Characterization resul...
A Comment on "The Far Future of Exoplanet Direct Characterization" - the Case for Interstellar Space Probes
Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics (astro-ph.IM) Earth and Planetary Astrophysics (astro-ph.EP) Galaxy Astrophysics (astro-ph.GA)
2010/12/27
Following on from ideas presented in a recent paper by Schneider et al. (2010) on "The Far Future of Exoplanet Direct Characterization", I argue that they have exaggerated the technical obstacles to p...
Comment on "Bayesian evidence: can we beat MultiNest using traditional MCMC methods", by Rutger van Haasteren (arXiv:0911.2150)
data analysis methods statistical
2010/3/18
In arXiv:0911.2150, Rutger van Haasteren seeks to criticize the nested sampling algorithm for Bayesian data analysis in general and its MultiNest implementation in particular. He introduces a new meth...
IS THE “STAR TREK”CONCEPT OF ALIENS REALLY NAIVE? -- A COMMENT ON DURIC AND FIELD
Astrobiology-Extraterrestrial intelligence-Radio lines general-Galaxy stellar content
2009/3/6
Several assumptions used in the recent review paper on the search
for extraterrestrial intelligence (SETI) by Duric and Field (2003) are critically dis-
cussed. New astrobiological results|in partic...